Substantial Progress
Eleven years after the events of 9/11, a United States Government Accountability Office report has concluded that “substantial progress” has been made in improving maritime security.
Maritime Security: GAO sees “Substantial progress”
Eleven years after 9/11, a GAO report finds that the U.S. has made “substantial progress” in improving maritime security.
GAO says that, 10 years after passage of the Maritime Transportation Security Act, its work has shown that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), through its component agencies, particularly the Coast Guard and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), have made substantial progress in implementing various programs that, collectively, have improved maritime security.
In general, GAO’s work on maritime security programs falls under four areas:
- security planning,
- port facility and vessel security,
- maritime domain awareness and information sharing, and
- international supply chain security.
DHS has, among other things, developed various maritime security programs and strategies and has implemented and exercised security plans.
The Coast Guard has developed Area Maritime Security Plans around the country to identify and coordinate Coast Guard procedures related to prevention, protection, and security response at domestic ports. In addition, to enhance the security of U.S. ports, the Coast Guard has implemented programs to conduct annual inspections of port facilities.
To enhance the security of vessels, both CBP and the Coast Guard receive and screen advance information on commercial vessels and their crews before they arrive at U.S. ports and prepare risk assessments based on this information.
Further, says GAO, DHS and its agencies have increased maritime domain awareness and have taken steps to better share information by improving risk management and implementing a vessel tracking system, among other things. For example, in July 2011, CBP developed the Small Vessel Reporting System to better track small boats arriving from foreign locations and deployed this system to eight field locations.
DHS and its component agencies have also taken actions to improve international supply chain security, including developing new technologies to detect contraband, implementing programs to inspect U.S.-bound cargo at foreign ports, and establishing partnerships with the trade industry community and foreign governments.
Although DHS and its components have made substantial progress, they have encountered challenges in implementing initiatives and programs to enhance maritime security since the enactment of the Maritime Security Transportation Act (MTSA) in 2002 in the areas of:
- program management and implementation;
- partnerships and collaboration;
- resources, funding, and sustainability; and
- performance measures.
Thus, although CBP designed and implemented an initiative that placed CBP staff at foreign seaports to work with host nation customs officials to identify high-risk, U.S.-bound container cargo, CBP initially did not have a strategic or workforce plan to guide its efforts.
The Coast Guard faced what GAO terms “collaboration challenges” when developing and implementing its information management system for enhancing information sharing with key federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies because it did not systematically solicit input from these stakeholders.
Budget and funding decisions have also affected the implementation of maritime security programs. For example, Coast Guard data indicate that some of its units are not able to meet self-imposed standards related to certain security activities–including boarding and escorting vessels.
In addition, DHS has experienced challenges in developing effective performance measures for assessing the progress of its maritime security programs. For example, the Coast Guard developed a performance measure to assess its performance in reducing maritime risk, but has faced challenges using this measure to inform decisions.
Read the report HERE
Source: Marine Log
